Q: BEA is coming to New York next May, just three weeks after my debut novel appears. Is it worth my while to attend? I'm being published by a small press; the total expense of attending the expo would exceed my advance. There's no question about wanting to go: I'd love to. But should I? From a practical perspective?
A: No. Dollar for dollar you'll get more out of attending a local book festival that connects you with readers; or a crime novel convention like Malice Domestic, Left Coast Crime, or Bouchercon (and there are several other good ones that escape my coffee-deprived noggin just now) that connects you with readers (unlike a writers conference that is mostly attended by writers and agents).
BEA is not a good place to make connections for an author. Bookstore owners are there to see what publishers are bringing out in the fall; publishers are there to persuade bookstore owners to order big. The rest of us are just blocking the aisles.
I've stopped encouraging my authors to attend BEA. There are lots of better ways to meet people and promote your novel.
2 comments:
I agree that agented authors can spend their time more fruitfully than at the BEA, but unagented writers can profit by attending the Writer's Digest event the day before when many agents are there to take pitches.
Normally I'd agree with Les, but I think the Writers Digest conference is going to be held apart from BEA in 2010. That was the word I got from Chuck Sambuchino last year. Whereever it's held though, I'm a fan!
Post a Comment