Saturday, July 21, 2012

A new wrinkle in the query game-rules of the game

Some time back I wondered whether offering non-form replies to queriers would be a good idea.  You said yes, and very enthusiastically.

I've decided to give it a whirl on a trial basis for the next few weeks.

On Saturday night (oh man, this is just proof positive I have no life!) if you query between 7pm and 8pm Eastern Daylight Time (and ONLY that time)  I will reply to you individually.  I may not reply during that exact time window, but your query has to arrive in that window.

You have to put "Chum Bucket" in the subject line so I know you WANT to participate.

I'd really REALLY appreciate it if you didn't write back to tell me all the reasons I'm an idiot until at least a day has gone by and you might have cooled down.

I am NOT guaranteeing feedback or critiques on each letter, although that may happen.  This is ONLY a personal, non-form reply guarantee.

The queries need to be for real.  If I request something and you tell me it's not ready, or you were just kidding, I will come to your house and gnaw on you till you realize the error of your ways.

Questions?

Shout out in the comment column and we'll develop an FAQ for our little experiment.

54 comments:

  1. Dang, I'd love to participate but my novel is still in revision. Plus, you don't rep my genre anyway. But I think you're very, very brave for doing this. I hope my fellow writers don't abuse your good intentions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Questions for 37 minutes minutes from now... How many queries did you get? Because of the short notice and tight timeframe, I wonder if they were more prone to error than your regular query stream? Did you notice a difference in quality?

    And a question for 24 hours after you send your last response: did anybody write you back with rudeness?

    I agree with Elissa - this is a brave, bole invitation indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "...come to your house and gnaw on you..." I love that line.

    I noticed you mentioned you might try this for a couple of weeks. If you're still doing this in two weeks, I'll throw my query out there as bait (revising six more chapters and then it's ready to send out). Added incentive to keep plugging away on revisions - thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. 3 queries! And it was FUN!!! (of course, no one has tried to firebomb my liquor stash yet so it may be early days)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Since the only MS I have to query is an Urban Fantasy, I'll sit back and observe your experiment. I look forward to your analysis!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hopefully you do this again next weekend. Going to follow this blog now.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Monica, for sure next week and the weeks through August. Then I'll evaluate and decide if I can continue.

    Honestly, it was FUN!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Are you allowing late-comers to send a new wrinkle query? I just saw your post. Late to the party again

    ReplyDelete
  9. Maleficient, you have to wait till next week, but I will be doing this through August.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Same time, same channel then!

    ReplyDelete
  11. [...]I'd really REALLy appreciate it if you didn't write back to tell me all the reasons I'm an idiot until at least a day has gone by and you might have cooled down.[...]

    I'm not sure whether to be surprised that anyone would even consider this... or be appalled that anyone would...

    Good luck with your test!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I can't imagine why anyone would send you hate mail for giving a professional critique of their query. But all the writers I've ever encountered are nice people who, like most of us, chafe at criticism, but are willing to accept it when it comes from someone who sincerely wants us to succeed.

    You're a superstar, Janet. :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cool, I have 7, count em, 7 novels in different stages of development- hopefully this will help me get my butt in gear. I have read your blog for years but never moved to respond until now - this is awesome!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Can someone requery you for the same project they've already queried for and get more detailed feedback about the specific query?

    Hypothetical question, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Colin, mostly it's people who think I didn't consider their query carefully enough. The way they know I didn't is cause I said no. No-win in other words.

    It's the price of admission and absent dire threats to my liquor cabinet, no problem.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks for the kind offer, Janet. See you Saturday at 7pm.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Well Blast and Dang-Nabbit!! I just sent my query to you last night. I wish I had held off 24 hours until I saw this!!!

    Oh well. I still think its awesome that you are taking the time to do this for others and they hope they go easy on you and don't make serious inroads on the liquor stash!

    ReplyDelete
  18. CW I can delete your query from the incoming pile and you can resend next week if you wish.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Let's do that! I will resend it next weekend. I'll be glad to take part in the fun! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is such a great idea - it makes me want to write mystery, just so I can play too.

    I wish there were more agents like you.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I'd be surprised if you weren't inundated within the next couple of weeks. But maybe you'll get the Next Big Thing out of this.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Janet, this is just one more reason why writers love and respect you so much. And I say this as an agented writer who doesn't write in your genre, so you know it's genuine, and not just kissing up! :D

    It does my heart good to know there are authentic people out there who still believe in doing altruistic good deeds. Thank you for doing this.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Kay, you know I do rep other things besides crime, right?

    CW--query deleted from my inbox (took me a while to find it oh you of the pseudonym!)

    ReplyDelete
  24. Haven't had a Saturday night date in years. See you at 7 in the PM...gee, I'm hoping I get to go all the way.
    But will you respect me in the morning?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Janet, I can't even tell you how awesome this is. Thank you. Also, I spent Saturday night reading. *grin*

    ReplyDelete
  26. I'll be watching this closely and hope it works well.

    For my day job I receive article submissions and when I need to reject one, I've found the less I say, the better.

    When I give feedback I seldom receive a sincere "thank you," but often have writers who want to debate my opinion, criticize me, or even threaten that "I'll be sorry."

    It's not worth the grief, so I've stopped giving feedback or offering an explanation.

    I hope your experience will be better.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Where do we send the query letters? I can't find a "contact me" spot on your blog?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Peterd, I have had much the same experience you have had. That was the reason I put the "must have this in subject line" direction. I'm hoping it will limit the experiment to people who WANT to hear.

    And sometimes the crap is just part of the price of admission to the circus.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Dear Janet,

    I went all day today thinking it was Saturday. Could you please pretend I didn't send my new wrinkle query 24 hours late?

    ReplyDelete
  30. I'll probably review my query letter 100 times this week, but I'm in there like swimwear come Saturday.

    ReplyDelete
  31. This is really fun! And as others have said above, I commend your bravery and forfeiture of Saturday nights. (As an aside, I'm still dismayed to hear that you receive anything but graciousness in response to feedback.)

    As for this new wrinkle idea, I liked knowing how many you got (3) and wonder if it might be cool to get a tally every week? Could be total received...or even how many resulted in requests for partials/fulls (or rejections). Just a thought.

    Anyway - thank you again for doing this! I'm excited to follow and participate!

    ReplyDelete
  32. I'll be there maybe not this week but by the end of August without doubt. Thanks Janet, what fun.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Would you like us to let all our friends know so you can get 12,000 queries?

    ReplyDelete
  34. fred, I've purposely not announced this widely. I'd prefer it be limited to those of you are paying attention--reading the blog, following me on Twitter. If it works out, we'll see about widening the scope.

    ReplyDelete
  35. This is a very nice and wonderful idea. Can't wait for Saturday night.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Would it be piggy to send in two queries for works in different genres (you accept both)? Somehow the books have ended up ready for querying at the same time.

    Second question -- do we include five pages as with a regular query?

    You're a doll...for a shark.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Diane, sorry I'm replying after an evening of revelry.

    1. ok to send more than one query but must be separate.

    2. DO include pages. This is a regular query.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I'm very interested in getting agent feed back on my book query, but my novel is not in your genre, is it still okay to send this coming Sat. and get your critique?

    ReplyDelete
  39. This isn't intended to be feedback, it's just a non-form response.

    And I really only want queries that are legit (ie you'd query me anyway.)

    QueryShark takes all queries and does provide feedback, but of course, not all queries can be posted. The archives are a great resource though.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Janet,
    Are you doing this again tonight? I am a family friend of Judy Jongsma Bobalik who spoke highly of you, and I would love to send you my query. Thank you for having two wonderful blogs that provide such insightful feedback!
    Laura Martin

    ReplyDelete
  41. Hi Laura, Yes I'm doing this again tonight, and every Saturday through August 2012.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Thanks for doing this! I'll try to
    get mine to you tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Oh, I SO wish I had an MS ready for this! Only halfway through a first draft. Dang it! But in my effort to eat/sleep/breathe writing lately, I can't wait to watch and learn from this process. You're wonderful for offering such a thing, and I hope it results in something great!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Do we send it to your FinePrint Literary address? Thanks for doing this!

    ReplyDelete
  45. LL, yes, you'd send it just like a regular query except noting it's for this particular thing.

    And you're welcome.

    (it's actually been quite fun)

    ReplyDelete
  46. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Hi Janet,

    I recently read and enjoyed Unraveling and wondered if you regularly represent YA books or if that was unusual?

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  48. I've posted this comment to Janet before, but maybe others of you can tell her and she'll listen. If she wrote and published a book on writing the query, it would become a best-seller, because we would all by it. Can you imagine The Query Shark touring the country with her minions, minnows, and rat-loving friends?

    ReplyDelete
  49. Oh Janet - this looks like so much fun! How I wish you rep'd MG. Maybe some of your colleagues will follow your lead and play too. I'll be reading to see how it goes.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Scratch that - I just read your rules for writers. You said: be imperfect, make mistakes, query everyone even if they don't rep your genre.
    You'll be hearing from me Saturday night. You have been forewarned.
    Thanks again for doing this.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Can't wait for Saturday night :-)

    Just to make sure I'm completely clear, should the subject line say:

    Chum Bucket Query for "title" ?

    Thanks! Love that you are doing this!

    ReplyDelete
  52. The subject line can say anything but MUST HAVE the words Chum Bucket in it.

    Now, a SMART participant will have Chum Bucket as the first two words followed by Query for (title).

    ReplyDelete
  53. As always, you are too cool, Janet! I wish I had something that fell in your interests to send. Have fun w/the chum! :o)

    ReplyDelete
  54. I just want to thank you for the Chum Bucket session last night. I am very grateful for the comments you made, even though my book was not one of your interests. What an exceptional person you are! I wish you all the best.

    ReplyDelete

Keep your comments succinct. Any comment that runs longer than 100 words is generally too long.

If you're commenting more than three times a day, it's too much.


Civility is enforced. Spelling/grammar mistakes may be pointed out ONLY in the blog post itself, not in any of the ensuing commenter's contributions.

If your comment doesn't show up, it's most likely that Blogger ate it. Try posting again using a GoogleID. (comment moderation is on only for older posts)